Impact factors and citation indices are a somewhat gold standard to measure quality and productivity of a scientist. But critics question the validity of these measures. Now, Jürgen Kaube writes in FAZ (24.7.2008) about a statistical report on impact factors commissioned by the International Mathematical Union (among others). The conclusion is, the significance of these citation measures like the impact factor or the Hirsch index is poor, if not nil.
» about
Tags:
in the media communication medicine science policy environment climate change corporate research physics internet energy nanotech space chemicals computing genetics pollution materials bird flu myblog mathematics disaster education review critique nature sustainability emerging diseases cloning software cars geology evolution nuclear cancer agriculture sports web 2.0 wikipedia neanderthals biomass aids biodiversity help stem cells smoking fire smoke obesity prevention fusion language robotics reference military aging romania
Tags:
aging agriculture aids biodiversity biomass bird flu cancer cars chemicals climate change cloning communication computing corporate research critique disaster education emerging diseases energy environment evolution fire fusion genetics geology help in the media internet language materials mathematics medicine military myblog nanotech nature neanderthals nuclear obesity physics pollution prevention reference review robotics romania science policy smoke smoking software space sports stem cells sustainability web 2.0 wikipedia
Recent Updates:
typolis: is powered by you and